Once you’ve signed a contract, it’s time to develop the project. The project design should follow the civic goals determined collaboratively by partners. Typically, the artist either refines their initial project idea, or proposes a project after a research or “getting to know you” phase. The project can be co-developed iteratively, and tweaked or redirected as community partners provide input and participant feedback is received.
There are many types of M/A projects, so it’s difficult to make a check-list of what needs to be done at this stage. Generally, developing a project includes engaging participants, setting up regular check-ins, managing timelines, identifying locations for project activities, laying the groundwork for documentation and evaluation, and other logistics.
During development, keep in mind that the project should emphasize art’s civic capacity. Determine how you’ll incorporate third-party or community partners into project planning. Develop clear criteria to guide thoughtful and transparent decision-making about the project’s direction.
The project itself might sit on a spectrum between art product and process, and might incorporate elements of both. Municipal staff often play supportive roles for the former, and co-creator roles for the latter.
Projects that foreground art products can include:
Temporary or permanent elements of public infrastructure
The Restorative Arts program is a partnership between Nashville’s Office of Arts and Culture (Metro Arts), the Juvenile Court, and the Oasis Center to create an arts-based intervention system for court-involved youth. Research shows that youth engagement with the arts results in more investment in education, greater community engagement, and better self esteem and social skills. The program provides arts workshops, performances, and other arts experiences for youth in juvenile detention, and for families and youth who are otherwise court-involved.
Metro Arts and the Oasis Center trains teaching artists and partner organization staff in restorative practices, understanding systemic racism, trauma-informed care, positive youth development, non-violent communication and storytelling. This equips artists to be effective front-line service providers for youth. Teaching artists introduce participants to art forms including spoken word, storytelling, theater, creative writing, beat making, music production, dance, visual art, yoga, and drumming.
Restorative Arts is intentional in its commitment to equity because social, structural, and systemic inequities are at the core of trauma experienced by many young people who end up in the juvenile justice system. Before creating the program, Metro Arts staff worked to understand the oppressive structures that exist in its own agency work, in the systems in which it interacts, and in its partnership with Juvenile Justice Center. Only by analyzing inequity, could it devise the program that could help break down barriers.
The Porch Light program is a collaboration between non-profit Mural Arts Philadelphia and the City of Philadelphia’s Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual disAbility Services. It is a dedicated program at Mural Arts with its own staff and outreach strategy. The program revolves around a community-created mural that illustrate themes around wellness and mental and behavioural health issues. These include issues that have had visible effects on the community, such as mental health, substance use, spirituality, homelessness, trauma, immigration, war, and neighborhood safety. Porch Light programs occur in lower-income communities in which transforming a public space will have a significant impact.
Each mural is created during a months-long program in partnership with a neighborhood public health organization and local artists. The partner organization hosts the project at a community site, and Porch Light works with staff (such as therapists) to refer clients to the program. Mural projects start with weekly artist-led creative workshops and dialogues about health for a core group of participants. Monthly open studios invite the entire community in. The lead artist creates a mural image from the output of the workshops, and the larger community helps to paint it during “Community Paint Days.”
Porch Light’s work promotes both community resiliency and recovery and public health. Their goals for the program include to: increase awareness about mental health; promote social inclusion; increase access to mental health resources; and develop cognitive skills related to art-making (i.e. abstract thinking, problem-solving, esteem-building). Outcomes include improving the physical environment, new opportunities for social connections, and greater understanding between neighbors.
Austin-based Forklift Danceworks activates communities through a collaborative creative process. Forklift’s performances are typically large-scale, site-specific civic spectacles that create deeper understandings of the jobs essential to urban life, more informed civic dialogue, and greater connection between citizens and across communities. My Park, My Pool, My City is a three-year artistic residency in partnership with the Austin’s Parks and Recreation Aquatics Division which began in 2017, activating and amplifying civic engagement around the future of Austin’s city pools. It was conceived of after a successful collaboration between Forklift and Austin’s Urban Forestry Program.
From 2015-17, Forklift Co-Directors Alison Orr and Krissie Marty participated in conversations and planning meetings with the Director and staff of the Parks & Recreation Department and neighborhood leaders. They came to more fully understand the importance of pools as public gathering spaces and the challenges Austin’s pools face. Austin’s 45 aquatics facilities are on average 50 years old, and many need more repairs than the city can afford. Conditions are particularly acute in the historically marginalized neighborhoods of East Austin.
As these neighborhoods expand and their demographics shift, My Park, My Pool, My City is, in part, an opportunity to celebrate and maintain the vibrant histories of these communities, and to bring Austinites together at the pool. For each of the three years, My Park, My Pool, My City centered on a different East Austin pool, creating summer performances in collaboration with aquatics maintenance staff, lifeguards, and neighborhood residents. Forklift also hosted and participated in community meetings and pool parties leading up to and following each show. The Aquatics Division provided access to city facilities, paid performing employees for their time, and informed the issues the project addresses. Through a process of deep listening and collaborative creation, Forklift artists invited staff and pool users to share their stories, and invited audiences to bear witness to the people whose labor supports life in Austin.
MAPC Artist in Residence Carolyn Lewenberg designed the bench for the Everett Earthworks Sculptural Garden. This community space also features mural panels by local high school students. Photo: MAPC
MAPC Artist-in-Residence Carolyn Lewenberg developed creative strategies for bringing people into a launch event for a cultural economic development strategy in the town of Wakefield, MA. This included making chalk sidewalk drawings with high school students. Photo: MAPC
MAPC Artist-in-Residence Carolyn Lewenberg designed an artmaking station modeled after a shoe-shine cart. Participants in Rockland, MA were invited to share places they valued most, and contribute a watercolor shoeprint to a community-wide public art project. Photo: MAPC
MAPC Artist-in-Residence Carolyn Lewenberg worked with Principal Land Use Planner Carlos Montanez on community engagement around the Everett Open Space and Recreation Plan. This included creating viewmasters for a local event to invite people to share their visual preferences. Photo: Renato Castelo
The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) is the regional planning agency serving residents and workers in the 101 cities and towns within the Metropolitan Boston area. The Artist in Residence program is part of MAPC’s Arts, Culture, and Planning Initiative, which is meant to bring arts, culture, and creativity into the agency’s multidisciplinary planning work with cities, towns, and local organizations.
MAPC’s first artist-in-residence, Carolyn Lewenberg, worked with 10 MAPC planners in departments including Land Use, Public Health, Environment, Government Affairs, and Strategic Initiatives. She contributed to 11 different projects by designing and carrying out arts engagement activities, curating other artists into programming, creating a public artwork, giving and moderating presentations, assisting with public relations materials, and other projects. She also participated in project development and planning, staff meetings, and time for reflection. She notes that this work was shaped by conversations with planners, MAPC staff, and community partners rather than a studio-based exploration of materials or community-based conversations. You can read more about her thoughts here.
Actor Anna Roberts-Gevalt engages with audience members during a performance based on the town meetings.
Photo: Bryanna Demerly
Members of a local NAACP chapter play a board game on the planning process, during a Building Home workshop.
Photo: Kevin Byrd, NRV Regional Commission
In 2010, the New River Valley Regional Commission, an independent planning agency in southwestern Virginia funded by local governments in combination with state and federal moneys, partnered with university theater professor Robert Leonard and some of his students from the Department of Theatre and Cinema at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, VA. The goal was to use the arts to increase and diversify public participation in developing a comprehensive regional plan. The plan was intended to address all essential elements of the community--housing, jobs, infrastructure, transportation, etc. Working with community artists, actors, and musicians as well, Leonard and his students used storytelling and theater-making techniques to facilitate and stimulate public conversation about the future of their communities in the New River Valley. These included Story Circle techniques, group sings, and Augusto Boal’s Image and Forum Theater.
Leonard writes this about the project:
“In the four weeks since the [first] storytelling session, those most resistant experienced a profound turn around, realizing they had made unvarnished statements, expressed passionately held values, and recognized important realities that they thought they would never reveal in public. They praised the experience because they could see the complexities of the situation through hearing different perspectives and needs. They recognized that sharing and hearing these perspectives contributed to an essential public conversation. [This experience was in sync with] a comment [I later heard] by [theater maker] Brent Blair, that art-making in public provides "a container for complexity" that is rare and vital for healthy civic discourse.”
The artists’ innovative use of performance and storytelling facilitated community engagement with participatory democracy and civic practice. By telling and hearing stories of local places they valued, residents felt able to participate and also got to know one another better. The agency had the means to bring some of the ideas from these conversations into planning decisions to everyone’s benefit.
Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan created the Chief Storyteller position because he wanted to “remodel the narrative” of a city that suffers from persistent negative mainstream media portrayals. Detroit is 83% African-American but many black residents feel left out of media coverage. The Mayor chose journalist Aaron Foley as Chief Storyteller to bring balance to how Detroit is portrayed, and to highlight positive stories centered in communities of color. Foley is a full-time employee of the City, and reports to the Mayor’s Chief of Staff. However the Chief Storyteller intentionally works independently from the Mayor’s Office, in order to create a new narrative of self-determination for the city.
Foley hired a small team of journalists and videographers that work independently from the city, to create media pieces for The Neighborhoods website and local cable news channel. There are currently over 200 stories on the site, fulfilling the intent to present a more diverse and nuanced portrait of Detroit and its people than is available through the popular media. The website also includes events and happenings, resources for families, information about block clubs, neighborhood organizations and volunteer opportunities, and information about the people and businesses that make Detroit home.
Pop Up Meeting is a project by Amanda Lovelee, a former Saint Paul City Artist, which seeks to increase diversity and participation in the city’s urban planning process. Lovelee retrofitted a city van as an ice cream truck, and asked residents to exchange survey responses and their thoughts about the city for a popsicle.
Saint Paul, MN
City Artist
Public Art Saint Paul, City of Saint Paul & local artists
Amanda Lovelee’s Urban Flower Field transformed a vacant lot with a spiral plot of flowers that remove contaminants from the soil.
Christine Baeumler’s project Bee Real Bee Everywhere created “high rise” sculptural homes for bees; and gives out pollinator seeds and education at local parks.
Christine Baeumler’s project Bee Real Bee Everywhere created “high rise” sculptural homes for bees; and gives out pollinator seeds and education at local parks.Credit: Carrie Thompson
Amanda Lovelee’s Pop-up Meeting offers popsicles in exchange for thoughts and feedback about the City.
Photo: Colleen Sheehy
Amanda Lovelee’s Pop-up Meeting offers popsicles in exchange for thoughts and feedback about the City.
Created in 2005, the City Artist integrates artists into the daily and long-term workings of the city. Program goals are to shape public spaces, improve city systems, and deepen civic engagement. Artists advise on major city initiatives and lead their own artistic and curatorial projects.
City Artist is a partnership between the City of Saint Paul and non-profit organization Public Art Saint Paul (PASP), which oversees public art programs for the city. Artists are part-time employees of PASP, and receive health and retirement benefits. This also allows for a more open-ended tenure for the artist rather than one that is restricted by the City’s time-limited contracts. This has proven valuable in terms of artists having extended time to build relationships, gain understanding of department opportunities and systems, and to develop projects with sufficient time to ensure impact.
Artists are embedded in City Hall and have dedicated work space within the Department of Public Works. In this way they can collaborate across city agencies. In addition to their own creative work, they advise on everything from city initiatives, planning studies, and capital project design, to ongoing street and sidewalk maintenance. Projects have included poetry stamped into concrete sidewalks, a vacant lot transformed by spiraling plots of flowers, and a civic choir.
Components of a project may be in flux even after it is launched.
Example
NYC PAIR artists The Lost Collective proposed to create a play with LGBTQ foster youth. As the artists and youth got to know each other, it was clear that they weren’t interested in this idea. They were, however, interested in making videos using their cell phones. The outcome—artistic expression—remained the same, but the medium and the deliverables changed.
Challenges & Strategies
Challenge
The artist and/or the municipality may feel pressured to produce something concrete early on. They are forced into moving too quickly by time constraints.
Strategies:
Structure in time for a research and development phase where nothing concrete is produced, or include a prototyping phase, and articulating the deliverable as a prototype.
Create smaller events at first that eventually lead to a larger project.
Create communications strategies early on in order to describe research and development activities.
Challenge
Project scope regarding resources, timeline, and/or capacities of partners or participants proves to be unrealistic.
Strategies:
Regular check-ins are crucial, to ask questions like: Does the budget meet project needs? Are people showing up? Is the project moving at the desired pace, and if not, why and what to do? Are the responsibilities assumed by leadership and participants in fair balance?
Scale back deliverables to meet the timeline, budget, or staff/artist capacity, or work to expand these resources.
The project may be more about setting up a model than fulfilling it. Managing expectations is crucial.
Challenge
Civic practice requires strengths that an artist or agency may need to develop.
Strategies:
Cross-sector collaboration in project design and decision-making may balance out abilities.
Artists should consider if another art form than the one/s they know best is more appropriate for the project. This could mean involving other artists.
Even though agency staff may have an established way they do their job, an M/A project might require a different approach.
Pursue training, mentorship, or other opportunities to learn new skills or capacities together.
Working In and With Communities
Many M/A projects involve geographic or other kinds of communities as participants. The most effective and meaningful projects result from community engagement strategies that are grounded in genuine curiosity, cultural sensitivity, ethical practice, and an openness and commitment to design that reflects the artist’s, agency’s, and community’s needs and interests. To build strong and equitable relationships with communities, consider the following:
Gain Trust and Credibility
Establishing trust is a major issue for outside artists entering community contexts. Professionals of all sorts have been known to go into communities to extract information without giving anything back, leaving the community feeling exploited. It’s important to intentionally set up processes to be accountable to communities.
Responsible engagement depends on artist and municipality mindfulness about:
Genuine collaboration with local partners: initiatives should serve reciprocal goals, not just those of the M/A partners;
Be clear about what is being proposed, and be willing to amend the project to meet community needs;
Make meetings, events, and other participation asks as accessible as possible to community needs, locations, and timelines;
Understand what makes it worthwhile for this community to participate;
Understand and plan for when leadership needs to shift to community members to sustain the project.
Learn about community histories and contexts
Both the artist and the municipality should learn as much as they can about the history of the place and the systems that influence it, and consider the ethics of and potential impacts (intended or not) of the proposed project or intervention. It’s important to be aware of dynamics around race, class, and economic inequities within a community or issue. Understanding how particular communities have been disenfranchised will identify groups and individuals who can help ensure that a new partnership is empowering and respectful.
Example
Planners for the Santo Domingo, NM Pueblo Housing and Heritage Trail Arts Project worked with the tribal government and residents on a pedestrian pathway between the pueblo and a rail station, that integrated community-determined cultural elements into planning and design goals. Project planner Joseph Kunkel, Executive Director of Sustainable Native Communities Collaborative writes, “It’s a time-intensive process...you have to rebuild relationships that have been hurt historically...You have to deal with [this] directly...from the beginning. Because historically tribal members had been promised many things that were not delivered upon, project managers had to be as transparent as possible, particularly since the planners themselves were viewed as outsiders (even though they have worked with native communities for many years).
Municipalities and artists may initiate a partnership project about a particular issue, and assume a leadership role around that issue. However this can alienate stakeholder organizations and residents who are directly affected by that issue. Self-determination and power are critical to those with the greatest stake in the issue, and honoring that is paramount to building mutual trust and strong relationships between M/A partners and community.
Artists may not recognize their cultural or class power in relationship to disenfranchised communities, and might even develop a “savior complex.” Artists have the privilege of doing work they care about, and often the privilege of leaving the community, the issue, and the municipal system at the end of the project, or even the end of each day.
Be Accountable
It’s important that partnerships be set up to include community organizations and other stakeholders in authentic and equitable ways. Both artist and municipal project leaders need to be mindful of community needs when establishing projects.
It’s important to invite local organizations that represent stakeholders and community members to the table. These organizations can help forge relationships with community members, provide expertise and context on a local issue, and can connect to local resources—all of which can advance the goals of the project. They also hold municipal and artist partners accountable. Embracing strong relationships between organizations that have already worked together honors knowledge and can move things forward.
“You can’t solely have deference to the top or the most known community groups. You can’t stop there. We take a deep dive in communities; you need depth and breadth in your search for information, input, or simply sharing what you are doing.”
Caitlin Butler & Laure Biron, Mural Arts Philadelphia
Involve community partners and groups early on. This means that M/A partners need to work hard to:
Sufficiently engage stakeholders in early planning and project design so that community needs can inform project goals and priorities;
Involve stakeholder partners during fundraising and in the budgeting process to ensure that resources are allocated equitably;
Form a steering committee that represents key stakeholders, and clearly define its role and authority.
As the project develops and is implemented:
Keep stakeholder partners in the loop as agendas and timelines are defined or changed.
Communicate with stakeholders regularly, asking: How are we doing?
Evaluate the project along the way to learn whether the partnership is being accountable to stakeholders, and make changes if it’s not.
Doing otherwise can leave potentially critical stakeholder partners feeling devalued, disempowered, and frustrated, which isn’t good for them or the project.
If you would like community members to participate, invite them into the project by:
Announcing initiatives at public convenings that local people attend, like town halls or PTA meetings.
Offering workshops or other public events at locations that people can get to easily and are familiar and comfortable with. These include institutions where people who are affected by the issue either live or spend time, such as prisons or group foster homes.
Richmond, VA
Performing Statistics
Art 180, Mark Strandquist & Richmond Police Department
Photo: Mark Strandquist, courtesy of Performing Statistics and ART 180
Performing Statistics was initiated in 2014 by artist/activist Mark Strandquist and Trey Hartt of Art 180, a non-profit organization that provides art programs for youth “living in challenging circumstances,” in collaboration with the Legal Aid Justice Center. In 2019 Performing Statistics became an independent non-profit.
Performing Statistics is a youth-centered cultural organizing project. It works with youth who are incarcerated or otherwise involved with the juvenile justice system to use creative expression as a way to reimagine the system. Key goals are to reduce police interactions and arrests, and to work towards police-free schools. Some of the many projects created by youth over the past five years include art works such as self-portraits and protest posters; radio spots featuring the voices of incarcerated youth; a justice parade; a number of exhibitions; and an educator curriculum.
The Performing Statistics team used these art projects to create a training workshop for Richmond Police officers, in collaboration with former Chief of Police Alfred Durham. The training includes activities that promote empathy building, trauma-informed approaches, family perspectives, and ideas for how police officers can reduce negative interactions with youth and disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline. The training was given to new recruits, seasoned police officers, and school resource officers. Due to its success, it is now required for all 700 officers in the Richmond police force. See this blog post for a description of one training.
Some of the structural factors at the heart of this partnership include:
Alignment of project goals with Police Department policies, including an emphasis on community policing, a departmental focus on youth engagement, and a Police Chief who actively sought new strategies to improve police-community relations.
Building relationships with decision-makers.
“Reaching the personal level has built the structural relationship for the project. If it wasn’t for our Police Chief coming to our exhibition and being moved by the words of the youth, then spending time [after] time talking with him, we wouldn’t be training police.” Trey Hartt, Project Director
Scaling up a grassroots, arts-based, community organizing model.
Photo: Mark Strandquist, courtesy of Performing Statistics and ART 180
Performing Statistics was initiated in 2014 by artist/activist Mark Strandquist and Trey Hartt of Art 180, a non-profit organization that provides art programs for youth “living in challenging circumstances,” in collaboration with the Legal Aid Justice Center. In 2019 Performing Statistics became an independent non-profit.
Performing Statistics is a youth-centered cultural organizing project. It works with youth who are incarcerated or otherwise involved with the juvenile justice system to use creative expression as a way to reimagine the system. Key goals are to reduce police interactions and arrests, and to work towards police-free schools. Some of the many projects created by youth over the past five years include art works such as self-portraits and protest posters; radio spots featuring the voices of incarcerated youth; a justice parade; a number of exhibitions; and an educator curriculum.
The Performing Statistics team used these art projects to create a training workshop for Richmond Police officers, in collaboration with former Chief of Police Alfred Durham. The training includes activities that promote empathy building, trauma-informed approaches, family perspectives, and ideas for how police officers can reduce negative interactions with youth and disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline. The training was given to new recruits, seasoned police officers, and school resource officers. Due to its success, it is now required for all 700 officers in the Richmond police force. See this blog post for a description of one training.
Some of the structural factors at the heart of this partnership include:
Alignment of project goals with Police Department policies, including an emphasis on community policing, a departmental focus on youth engagement, and a Police Chief who actively sought new strategies to improve police-community relations.
Building relationships with decision-makers.
“Reaching the personal level has built the structural relationship for the project. If it wasn’t for our Police Chief coming to our exhibition and being moved by the words of the youth, then spending time [after] time talking with him, we wouldn’t be training police.” Trey Hartt, Project Director
Scaling up a grassroots, arts-based, community organizing model.
Setting up opportunities for reciprocal learning with community members, in which residents and artists learn from each other. Setting up story circles, gathering oral histories, and facilitating other participatory events show an interest in local experience, and communicates respect for what residents know. This material may find its way into the artwork.
Challenges & Strategies
Challenge
Sometimes communities are resistant to artists and municipalities, who may be perceived as meddling and/or lacking awareness of the ethics of working in and with communities.
Strategies:
Be mindful of the potential for distrust towards government, and outsiders.
When requesting community input, make sure to apply it to the project.
Find authentic ways to work with local partners that are meaningful to and benefits them, and when possible, engage an artist who already has experience with the local partner.
“Being engaged” can be time-consuming and exhausting for some community members. If you co-design projects with them, they can determine the appropriate level of their participation.
Challenge
Art can provide a different perspective to a community issue. How do you deepen the experience or inquiry so that it can be transformative?
Strategies:
Create an environment where people can explore something through art more fully than they could in another format.
Acknowledge the strengths in participants’ creative endeavors, and what is meaningful to them.
Provide opportunities for self-discovery for all team members.
“I like to think of people in communities as having the creativity within themselves to continue to make the places they are already making. I’m not bringing anything there but rather elevating people's capacity to continue to do what they're already doing. I work lightly within those communities to add a little focus on capacity.”
Artist Rick Lowe, Project Row Houses